Sunday, April 10, 2016

Social Media: The American Museum of Natural History and Queens Library

The American Museum of Natural History and the Queens Library are both significant cultural institutions in New York, serving large audiences.  Both of these institutions should be using social media to communicate with guests and potential guests about upcoming programs, events, and materials that can be accessed on-site and online. A brief analysis of how American Museum of Natural History and the Queens Library currently use social media, and a look at current best practices for social media, will show how these institutions are using social media successfully and what can be improved. While “little research has explored the possibilities arising from the use of the Internet (Web and social media), particularly in the case of museums,” (Padilla-Meléndez & del Águila-Obra, 2013), informal social media guidelines written by information science professionals like Kristina Fong and Kasia Grabowska can be used to understand effective social media practices.

The American Museum of Natural History, an internationally acclaimed museum of science and culture, has a mission to “discover, interpret, and disseminate—through scientific research and education—knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe” (American Museum of Natural History). Social media could be an ideal platform for the museum to achieve its mission of disseminating information and knowledge. The museum currently uses YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, Tumblr, and Google+ to communicate with its audience, as well as disseminating podcasts using iTunes and providing a mobile application for Apple and Android phones. Links to the museum’s social media pages are always accessible to a user from the lower bar of their website, so the user always has the option to navigate to a social media site. The American Museum of Natural History certainly has a significant number of followers on each of its social media pages. The museum does not appear to have a social media policy, but a web page titled “Social Media” on the museum website directs visitors to social media sites, saying: “Enlighten your day with a daily dose of science. Stay up to date with the latest Museum news on Twitter, be inspired by images from the Museum’s Digital Special Collections on Pinterest or share science with all your friends on Facebook” (American Museum of Natural History). While this is not a social media policy, the museum does have a commitment to using social media to communicate with its audience.

The American Museum of Natural History uses social media to post about events, speakers, and information about materials or animals in the collection, like fossils and dinosaurs. The museum is truly using social media to achieve its mission by posting videos of lectures, pictures of dinosaurs, links to articles about new research, and other information with a lot of educational value. 
Despite the museum’s large number of followers and its mission-centric use of social media, audience engagement with the museum’s social media is inconsistent. Kristina Fong, the former Digital Marketing Associate of the Walker Art Center, writes about social media: “If your likes go up and your engagement numbers also don’t go up (number of active comments and conversations), that’s a problem. That means you’re boring your new followers” (Fong, 2013). Although the museum has 282,000 followers on Twitter, some of its posts have fewer than 20 likes or shares, while some have higher numbers. The Museum of Modern Art in New York is currently rated second on Museum Analytics, and the museum has high levels of engagement on social media. Each MoMA tweet has at least twenty likes and Retweets, and at most, several hundred. On Facebook, the American Museum of Natural History has similar engagement numbers to MoMA. Posts can garner as few as thirty or forty reactions or are many as several thousand. Both AMNH and MoMA have much higher levels on engagement on Instagram, an image-based, photo-sharing social media platform. American Museum of Natural History does not match MoMA’s engagement numbers on Instagram, which are consistently in the thousands, but AMNH does achieve a consistently high level of engagement for its Instagram posts. Each of AMNH’s Instagram posts receives several hundred or several thousand likes.

The fact that Instagram is so popular for museum audiences shows that users like the format of viewing the image first and getting the information second. The image catches the eye, and the user is drawn in to read more about the picture they are seeing. MoMA is most likely getting such a significant response from Instagram users because MoMA posts aesthetically interesting, colorful, high quality pictures. American Museum of Natural History’s Instagram posts are also eye-catching, and colorful pictures of subjects like dinosaurs, butterflies, and gems are doing a good job of attracting users. The museum is doing a good job of including these pictures on all of its social media pages.

While the American Museum of Natural History is using social media to disseminate knowledge by posting facts about natural history and videos of speakers, it could be doing more to engage its audience. While AMNH does modify posts slightly for each social media platform, the museum posts the same news and information on each site, using the same pictures. Kristina Fong writes: “Form follows function. I think one of the worst things you could do is sync your tweets/Tumblr/Facebook accounts” (Fong, 2013). The AMNH’s use of crossposting means that social media-savvy audience members who follow the museum on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, and Instagram are seeing the same posts on each account, which could be boring for the user. Similarly, if a user likes a post on Instagram, they are not going to like the same post on Facebook and Twitter, which could easily be driving down engagement numbers for the museum. The museum should work on posting information differently on each site, to keep the interest of its users. The museum also uses very scientific vocabulary in its posts. Although it is necessary for the museum to use the appropriate scientific vocabulary, long, complicated names of plants and animals probably do not hold much meaning for the average user. Kristina Fong notes that “[s]ocial media managers fall between marketing & education & interpretation & editors” (Fong, 2013). The museum is meeting its mission by posting educational information about the natural world, but the museum is not doing enough interpretation on its social media pages. The museum should work to create more context in its posts so that the user can get more out of even a short tweet or Facebook post. Overall, the museum appears to be successfully using social media to achieve its mission of disseminating knowledge and educating its audience. The museum should improve upon its use of social media by generating more engagement among users.

As a public library serving “2.3 million people from 62 locations” (Queens Library, 2016). Queens Library has the opportunity to use social media to connect patrons to the library, and bring patrons into its many branches. The Queens Library mission is “to provide quality services, resources, and lifelong learning opportunities through books and a variety of other formats to meet the informational, educational, cultural, and recreational needs and interests of its diverse and changing population” (Queens Library, 2016). The library’s social media contributes to this mission by allowing the library to communicate with its audience about the services, resources, books, and other media that is available through the library system. The library uses a variety of social media platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, Google+, Foursquare, and Tumblr. Queens Library does have a social media policy on its website. The policy states:
Queens Library offers blogs, ratings, reviews, comments, and other social software tools for educational, cultural, and recreational purposes. Library social software tools provide a limited (or designated) public forum to facilitate the sharing of ideas, opinions, and information about library-related subjects and issues. Library social software is intended to create a welcoming and inviting online space where library users will find useful and entertaining information and can interact with library staff and other library users (Queens Library, 2016).
The policy also defines what the library constitutes as social software, and contains “Rules for Commenting and Posting” for its users. The policy does not seem to include any guidelines for the staff members moderating the social media sites; perhaps there is an internal policy that staff members use.

The library's use of Facebook, with 25,847 followers for the Queens Library’s page, contributes to the library’s mission with posts about events, new books and music, and information about services. Although it provides other media besides books, Queens Library social media seems to focus on advertising the library’s new books, and sometimes music. Despite the library’s large audience, engagement is very low on its Facebook page, with posts often getting under ten reactions, and often only one or two likes or shares. Engagement is also very low on the library’s Twitter page; while the library has 13,600 followers, tweets often have no responses from the audience. Like other institutions, Queens Library has higher levels of engagement on its Instagram. Even though its Instagram page has only 2,341 followers, many posts get at least 20 likes. On Instagram, the library posts pictures of events and new books, as well as quotes from popular authors. These quotes contribute to the educational part of the library’s mission. It is difficult to compare the library’s social media activity with the activity of an institution like MoMA. MoMA has an international following, while Queens Library’s online audience is most likely comprised of local patrons who use the library’s branches. MoMA and Queens Library also disseminate different kinds of information; while MoMA’s posts focus on events about visual art and artists, Queens Library advertises community services and programs. Although Queens Library is actively using social media, its low engagement numbers show the library could be doing more with its social media pages.



While the library does not have the online following of an institution like MoMA, there are ways that Queens Library could improve its social media efforts to encourage more engagement. Kasia Grabowska writes on the blog Tame the Web: “A library website should be an entry point to social media; you need to create awareness” (Grabowska, 2010). Although links to social media are present on the Queens Library website, the links are not visible to the user. The Queens Library website is very engaging, and the library could use it more effectively to direct users to social media. Grabowska also writes on using social media: “Be helpful, stay relevant, and focus on your community’s needs” (Grabowska, 2010). The library could do much more active posting on community news and events, such as news from individual branch libraries. The library has a huge amount of programming and services, but most of these programs and services are not advertised on social media. The library could start by doing more posts on each day’s events and programs, even programs that happen weekly. The library could also consider using languages other than English to make its social media more relevant to its community. The Queens Library audience is multilingual, and on the website users have the option to translate pages into different languages. However, all of the library’s social media posts are in English. Multilingual posting could potentially be confusing for users, but it could also engage users who speak English as a second language. While the library is on the right track by posting about new acquisitions and events, it could be using social media to engage with the community and announce programs and services the community can use and enjoy.





American Museum of Natural History. Mission statement. Retrieved from             http://www.amnh.org/about-the-museum/mission-statement

American Museum of Natural History. Social media. Retrieved from             http://www.amnh.org/social-media

Fong, K. (2013, April 4). On Social Media as a Job (at a Museum). Retrieved from http://goshkristina.tumblr.com/post/47113948750/on-social-media-as-a-job-at-a-museum

Grabowska, K. (2010, March 18). Social Media Best Practices for Libraries: A TTW Guest Post. Retrieved from http://tametheweb.com/2010/03/18/social-media-best-practices-for-libraries/

Padilla-Meléndez, A. and del Águila-Obra, A.R. (2013). Web and social media usage by museums: online value creation. International Journal of Information Management 33(5), 892-898. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.07.004

Queens Library. (2016). About us. Retrieved from http://www.queenslibrary.org/about-us

Queens Library. (2016). Mission statement. Retrieved from

Queens Library. (2016). Social media policy. Retrieved from                   https://www.queenslibrary.org/about-us/social-media


No comments:

Post a Comment